XFX GeForce 9600 GSO Fatal1ty Video Card

Comment from killerman778
Time: February 22, 2009, 9:39 am

lmaoo

Comment from u2konline
Time: February 22, 2009, 1:16 pm

huh, whats so funny

Comment from u2konline
Time: February 22, 2009, 8:28 pm

oooooooooooh ok. thanks i guess. peace

Comment from killerman778
Time: February 22, 2009, 4:27 pm

idk u2k said lmao i say lmao…lmao

Comment from purplewolfpimp
Time: February 22, 2009, 6:28 pm

I have this videocard in my computer not as good as it should be , but works better then my old 1600 from radion

Comment from u2konline
Time: February 22, 2009, 8:28 pm

oooooooooooh ok. thanks i guess.
peace

Comment from killerman778
Time: February 22, 2009, 9:04 pm

peace!

Comment from lazeepnoy
Time: February 23, 2009, 9:30 am

You can overclock this to 700MHZ Coreclock

Comment from kazignu
Time: February 23, 2009, 8:46 pm

“..right up your alley..” keep thinking hes gonna say “right up your ass…”rofl

Comment from 67Eftw
Time: February 23, 2009, 9:04 pm

I’ve got a question. What is better a reg Nvidia 9600 GSO or a nvidia 8800gt>?Please reply if possible

Comment from druidkg
Time: February 23, 2009, 5:11 pm

good card

Comment from newkie2008
Time: February 24, 2009, 12:27 am

why this videos have subtitles in spanish?

Comment from 5irRatchet
Time: February 24, 2009, 2:08 am

ECKS EFF ECKS!!!! lol

Comment from kazignu
Time: February 23, 2009, 8:46 pm

“..right up your alley..”

keep thinking hes gonna say “right up your ass…”

rofl

Comment from 67Eftw
Time: February 23, 2009, 9:04 pm

I’ve got a question. What is better a reg Nvidia 9600 GSO or a nvidia 8800gt>?
Please reply if possible

Comment from stanfosi
Time: February 24, 2009, 4:28 am

9600gso, because they are easyer to overclock stable.

Comment from montanaxxx
Time: February 23, 2009, 11:12 pm

8800gt

Comment from IkePwnzU
Time: February 24, 2009, 12:53 pm

I have his headset, but i wouldnt DARE get this… I’d get a 295 XD

Comment from METMAN92towhoknows
Time: February 24, 2009, 3:50 pm

what is CUDA exactly?

Comment from Fmofdeath
Time: February 24, 2009, 5:23 pm

Fatal1ty 9600?………Why doesn’t he have Fatal1ty laptops with integraded video with that. Or anything not worth gaming with. 9600 ain’t bad but come on…

Comment from Shakraka
Time: February 24, 2009, 6:23 pm

Hmm, this or the PNY 9600 GT?

Comment from SHOOT3RI09
Time: February 28, 2009, 3:18 pm

would this card play cod4 or gears of war on max withh a decent framerate on 17″ monitor

Comment from jngtigmsmff
Time: February 28, 2009, 8:05 pm

Yes very ezy u will prob get like 125 fps steady on cod4

Comment from immadodgeguy
Time: March 1, 2009, 12:00 pm

i have one of these cards and i can get 60s in frames on CoD4 max settings with resolution 1440×900(overclocked)

Comment from immadodgeguy
Time: March 1, 2009, 12:03 pm

actually that was stock clock, overclocked will get me 80s (both r good)very easy to overclock, barely heats up with a 150 MHz boost on everything

Comment from atthelord
Time: March 2, 2009, 10:08 pm

dude is this tri sli compatible???

Comment from Romulus47plus1
Time: March 3, 2009, 11:49 am

Hey, anyone missing the benchmarks? I miss em so much =(

Comment from cradleofchris13
Time: March 5, 2009, 1:50 pm

hmm would i get better performance with two of these in SLI or one xfx 9800gtx+ black edition? PLease answer!

Comment from groundxero1992
Time: March 8, 2009, 2:11 pm

one 9800gtx+

Comment from atthelord
Time: March 8, 2009, 10:13 pm

how many stream processors man??? and also can i do sli?? and i use 21 inch monitor so willll it work well in sli with all settings in most of the games turned to medium???

Comment from stevezzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Time: April 21, 2009, 7:39 am

Hello TigerDrirectBlog looked over your site and found a decent video card the (XFX GeForce 9600 GSO Video Card – 1024MB DDR2) i was just wondering if you ship to Australia.Thank You

Comment from Bl4kk4lb
Time: April 21, 2009, 10:35 am

i think you can run it on high at 1440×900 or 1650×1050 well, not in very high

Comment from gschreiber94
Time: April 21, 2009, 8:31 pm

they wont answer you on here, you have to email albert. and im not sure if they do, but good luck

Comment from alex19900527
Time: April 22, 2009, 1:06 pm

THIS GUY FUCKEN SUCKS HE NEEDS TO SHOW FPS FOR GAMES MAN WHERE DID the other guy go ALBERT U SUCK and your boring

Comment from sammen89
Time: April 23, 2009, 8:34 pm

What happened to the other guy?

Comment from gschreiber94
Time: April 23, 2009, 10:21 pm

he quit, but now he has his own channel and website; look up razetheworld

Comment from techmaster9
Time: April 24, 2009, 10:58 am

I have the 9600 gso 768mb card and it runs great. Im running it at 1920×1024, dual dvi ports, svideo, u can even buy and hdmi adapter for. awesome card!

Comment from Nitro090995
Time: April 26, 2009, 7:31 am

You could problaly get away with 2 of these in SLI on a 550 watt PSU

Comment from Raenydyne
Time: April 26, 2009, 10:13 am

I got out NFS UC thinking I would try it with this card and perhaps make a custom profile but for some reason, Undercover detected and added some settings.max’d them out from the beginning and it looks great (compared to before anyway). Shaun White runs really good too, which I was expecting, but well known as a “choppy” game. Test Drive Unlimited runs much better, I don’t have to force VSync like other cards because this card keeps up. Crysis sucks so I don’t bother but sure it runs

Comment from brigzilla
Time: May 16, 2009, 4:52 pm

450 its a trerrible card really

Comment from banjosolid
Time: May 17, 2009, 10:50 am

anyone know how this card will run crysis?

Comment from banjosolid
Time: May 17, 2009, 10:51 am

does crysis actualy run on this card tho? and if so what settings can it run at?

Comment from Raenydyne
Time: May 17, 2009, 2:57 pm

It should run on high with a lower AA setting. I usually do medium settings with high textures and 8xAA, looks better to my eyes and don’t have any slowdown. Crysis really looks good on any setting so don’t get caught up in benchmarks and fps because usually people exaggerate what can be done and don’t really know what they are talking about when it comes to playable.

Comment from Raenydyne
Time: May 17, 2009, 3:02 pm

There are several configurations you could try but just keep your resolution balanced. Like if you put everything on the highest, use the lowest resolution. To me it actually plays and looks good on low resolutions with higher settings. But if you want to see more world, it runs fine at 1440×900 on medium or even high if you turn down AA. But definately one of the better “cheap” cards if you want to run Crysis. UT3 is much more fun and runs max’d out. Makes Crysis look lame IMO.

Comment from mefzg1
Time: May 22, 2009, 5:53 am

I like fatal1ty but i think his products are more expensive than oder non fatal1ty products!!!

Comment from immadodgeguy
Time: May 25, 2009, 12:03 pm

I tried test drive unlimited with this card and found it to be pretty darn good, i got mine running max settings at 1440×900 max AA getting about 50 or so frames and it seems to keep up well with the heavy plantation when ur flying down the road at 210mph

Comment from bronxvirus
Time: May 26, 2009, 6:42 pm

im going to run 2 of these on my cheap build ..

Comment from aschris87
Time: May 29, 2009, 7:23 pm

IV GOT 2 OF THESE THE DDR3 VERSION

Comment from MAPfromtheNYC
Time: May 30, 2009, 8:01 pm

this card is only 70$ now

Comment from immadodgeguy
Time: June 5, 2009, 2:42 pm

honestly this card gave me the best bang for the buck. i payed $70 for it at tiger-direct installed and was truly amazed. do not underestimate this video card, it lets me run CoD4 1440×900 75Hz 4x AA all maximum settings and its giving me 130 frames!!overall amazing card

Comment from PrimalDragon
Time: June 10, 2009, 10:34 pm

could somone give me a realistic crysis benchmark…cuzz this guy never leaves benchmarks any more

Comment from naylo540
Time: June 12, 2009, 11:03 pm

this basically is if you want to play good games while only paying 70$ and woot i already have 60$ saved up so this is the one im gunna get

Comment from Ashenxxx
Time: June 16, 2009, 4:02 pm

probably 2x-30fps @ very high and ~50-ish @ medium..1280×1024

Comment from 101BoT101
Time: June 21, 2009, 4:37 pm

Is this better than the EVGA GeForce 9600 GSO ?Whats the price range ?

Comment from NuBs4Down
Time: June 24, 2009, 7:55 am

Is this graphicscard really so loud (from xfx..) or is mine defect ?? I need an answer thx

Comment from camargo2012
Time: June 24, 2009, 8:58 am

it is loud because it is overclocked, and you can overclock it more.xfx told me that they can send you something to stop it from getting loud, but you have to be on warranty.i have it too!!!

Comment from camargo2012
Time: June 24, 2009, 9:02 am

i can play crysis @ 1440 x 900 at very high and no lag with this video card, the XFX edition.my specs:intel pentium D @ 3.06 GHznvidia GeForce 9600 GSO OC2GB ULTRA DDR2 @ 667 MHz

Comment from cowproX
Time: June 24, 2009, 8:33 pm

camargo2012 where do u go to get it? pzl response i really need to know

Comment from camargo2012
Time: June 24, 2009, 8:47 pm

you can get it from compusa . com or tigerdirect . com or just look for a compusa or best buy store near you!!!

Comment from arni291
Time: June 27, 2009, 1:12 am

not full res and details

Comment from sanyo213
Time: June 29, 2009, 11:06 pm

just wondering would this card work on a 40 inch screen??

Comment from truel0v31nth3n3wg1r1
Time: June 30, 2009, 11:49 pm

is the 8600GTS better?

Comment from jasonz001
Time: July 1, 2009, 3:20 am

no. the 9600 gso is better by a bit

Comment from q2DarkLord
Time: July 1, 2009, 2:51 pm

the best edition of 9600 GSO is the ASUS TOP edition, i get impresive overclock, GPU= 727MHZ, MEM dd3: 2206 Shaders: 1875 MHZ, very stable and not have artifacts. de GPU temp on max load is only 52C, with factory cooling.

Comment from TrippyTro
Time: July 7, 2009, 1:46 am

how much does this cost?

Comment from hmongshuffle
Time: July 10, 2009, 9:07 pm

like $80.00 im buying my in 2 weeks…

Comment from TrippyTro
Time: July 10, 2009, 9:38 pm

damn thats a really good price

Comment from azraaell
Time: July 13, 2009, 9:31 am

2 x 9600 gso’s with 96 cores, or 1 x gtx 260 or 2 x 8800 gts 320mb????

Comment from ssnunom
Time: July 15, 2009, 9:56 pm

will it play COD 4 and 5? on high?and empire total war and the new games comming out?reply fast please i’m planning buying it soon and I need an opinion

Comment from IIIlllll
Time: July 19, 2009, 10:36 pm

If you have pcix2.0 on ur motherboard and 2gb of ram or more then you can. I made a build for a friend with that card and it runs it smooth at a 22″ resolution on max settings. (1680×1050)

Comment from ssnunom
Time: July 19, 2009, 11:20 pm

I have to trade my 9600 GSO for a 9400GT because it was to powerfull to my motherboard and power suply that sucks (

Comment from bristowman
Time: July 20, 2009, 8:59 am

the futuremark thing i got with my XFX geforce 9600 GSO normal card is only for Vista. Sorry XP guys like me!

Comment from IIIlllll
Time: July 20, 2009, 10:50 am

How many watts do you have on your psu? I’m running 1 9800GT on a 400w.

Comment from mognovox
Time: July 20, 2009, 11:52 am

what wattage psu would I want to run two of these guys?

Comment from ssnunom
Time: July 20, 2009, 1:01 pm

450watts. it was so hot and the graphics card doesn’t work -.- the only thing I saw was stripes on my screen…. the 9400 GT works well and it’s not so bad after all

Comment from IIIlllll
Time: July 20, 2009, 1:29 pm

I’m going to go ahead and guess that you did not have enough amps on the psu or the graphics card came defective. Usually when I get stripes on my screen it is because my overclock is not stable. But if you’re happy with your 9400 then it won’t matter lol.

Comment from JuniorDExchangecore
Time: July 20, 2009, 8:01 pm

Just use a better power supply… and there is no way any motherboard cannot handle and graphics card…

Comment from HKFLX4656
Time: July 21, 2009, 9:30 pm

650W or 750W

Comment from K00lPunk90
Time: July 21, 2009, 11:42 pm

750 no less my friend u dont want to stress ur power supply

Comment from mognovox
Time: July 22, 2009, 1:14 pm

yea thanks for the info

Comment from avp715
Time: July 26, 2009, 5:30 pm

WoW or counter strike on a small monitor? I have a 9600GSO and it plays Far Cry 2 and Crysis at 1920×1200 with almost all settings at high and 16x AF.It’s a different version tho: 192 bit, 384Mb GDDR3

Comment from madjimms
Time: July 29, 2009, 12:32 am

wow.. unless your running a FULLY loaded setup this is overkill for a 16amp 60watt video card…..

Comment from trp09876
Time: August 2, 2009, 3:25 am

ATi redon 4650 1 GB DDR2 VS XFX 9500 GT 1GB DDR2 ?which one is better?

Comment from kevin957
Time: August 2, 2009, 7:51 pm

ATI

Comment from trp09876
Time: August 3, 2009, 7:34 am

ok ATI is better so should i buy XFX ATI redeon 4650 1 GB ddr2 or HIS ATI redeon 4650 1 GB ddr 2 ……i mean should i go with XFX or HIS ???or is there any other card which is better than both of these it it comes with the same price !!

Comment from K00lPunk90
Time: August 11, 2009, 10:15 pm

well i got this card but not the stupid red onei got the gso 1.5 gb and ima buy another one for no reason because i can and becasue ima get it out of the way cause in like 2 years ima need it lol

Comment from Krump1025
Time: August 17, 2009, 8:41 pm

CAN YOU RUN THIS ON 300 WATTS??

Comment from slugger449
Time: August 17, 2009, 10:04 pm

Listen closely at 1:40 to 1.45He said: “You need a minimum of 400 watts…”

Comment from skinny3600
Time: August 21, 2009, 10:31 am

is he touching the connector….he just touched the connector……

Comment from aschris87
Time: September 3, 2009, 9:47 pm

iv got a 17 inch lcd on this and it still taxes that card…

Comment from ObserverAlpha
Time: September 7, 2009, 7:58 pm

you could buy the cheap 9500 gt as an alternative, no more issues about the power supply, it’s midrange, and you could crank Crysis to high settings, and it run smoothly, try it on Ultra high but with just a minor setback, a pause but still it runs smooth on most areas.. just have at least 2g of ddram

Comment from mongol63
Time: September 9, 2009, 8:15 pm

What games will this card run?

Comment from mongol63
Time: September 9, 2009, 8:20 pm

Can you run Empire Total War, Darkest of days smoothly on high?

Comment from ObserverAlpha
Time: September 10, 2009, 12:23 am

well 9500 gt has a 1g video card.. it sure do.. it is already direct x 10.0.. it’s a budget card, but a decent one, I had this on my other PC, and yep! it’s still powerful, do some research and still it’s good

Comment from ahmadclk
Time: September 15, 2009, 6:45 pm

lol thats a good one, run crysis high on a 9500 GT. My brother has it and he can barely run crysis on 800×640.

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: September 19, 2009, 5:58 pm

no.

Comment from mongol63
Time: September 19, 2009, 7:16 pm

No what?

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: September 19, 2009, 9:03 pm

no it cant run those smoothly on high

Comment from neptoon07
Time: September 20, 2009, 12:40 pm

would this card work good with flight simulator

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: September 20, 2009, 4:38 pm

it depends what flight simulator

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: September 20, 2009, 4:41 pm

Mongol id recommend the 9600 GT 512mb GDDR3, you an check amazon, i know there is multiple used 9600 GT verto’s on there for the same price as this card (sub $80).The 256 bit memory bus and GDDR3 is what you want, those specifications should define mid range cards, the core, shader, and memory clock are dynamic and supplementary.

Comment from neptoon07
Time: September 20, 2009, 5:17 pm

Microsoft flight simulator x

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: September 20, 2009, 8:20 pm

yeah if you overclock the core to 610 or above, are playing on a resolution below 1920×1200 (24inch wide), and have anti-aliasing disabled, your probably good to go for a framerates above 45fps

Comment from chrisgman92
Time: September 27, 2009, 5:47 am

I just got this card and i play Flight Simulator X on full settings, works well.

Comment from neptoon07
Time: September 27, 2009, 10:02 am

thats good thanks

Comment from SRNF
Time: September 29, 2009, 4:28 pm

ye most of them it wouldn’t be able to max graphics on the newest ones thou

Comment from niels2029
Time: October 8, 2009, 12:32 am

yes it would in flight simulator… you can overclock it for maximum power… plus it has free a benchmark software which you can test your gpu…. also remember a good cpu… good luck

Comment from Randomthingz1
Time: October 9, 2009, 11:30 pm

would this run flash point 2?

Comment from rambow70
Time: October 14, 2009, 5:56 pm

why do they slap fatality on all the shitty parts, like a 500watt psu a 960gso and other crap, it should be high end

Comment from silenceyouidiot
Time: October 15, 2009, 12:22 am

Shit, I remember playing combat flight simulator 1 with the 5800, back when that was a high end card.

Comment from aschris87
Time: October 18, 2009, 11:13 pm

lol it struggles on my 17inch lcd lol

Comment from ebayporn123
Time: October 21, 2009, 6:38 am

this card = $60this card with the name (fatal1ty) =$100

Comment from ahmadclk
Time: October 26, 2009, 6:04 pm

if you’re lucky to find a bargain. I got mine for 50$ (with mail in rebate) plus it’s factory oc. I have got to say it is the best 50 bucks i have ever spent. You get the most bang for ur buck.

Comment from BuffMcGruff1
Time: October 31, 2009, 3:02 pm

Couldn’t have said it better my self. Though..still a good card.

Comment from ebayporn123
Time: October 31, 2009, 3:03 pm

yesierie

Comment from ryanbrown321
Time: November 3, 2009, 3:48 pm

ive got this card running on dual 17″ LCD monitors and it runs perfectly fine. My comp is a dell Optiplex 745 dual core with 4gb memory and a soundblaster sound card (start laughing now) but it runs FSX almost maxed, and Fallout 3 maxed perfectly fine. (only use one monitor for Fallout 3) and cant forget Oblivion

Comment from aschris87
Time: November 3, 2009, 4:46 pm

yeah maybe but im runing a dual core 2.8ghz overclocked @ 3.1ghz 2gb of ddr2 800mhz of kingston hyperx ram a 320gb wd black ed hard drive coolermaster tx3 cpu cooler blueray drive the 9600gso soundblaster se 7.1 sound card iv got 2 more gig of ram to put in when my new gigabyte mobo comes am3 ready

Comment from aschris87
Time: November 3, 2009, 4:50 pm

runing windows vista 64 bit pro + im in the middle of building a quad core system (((starts laughing harder)))…

Comment from ryanbrown321
Time: November 3, 2009, 10:24 pm

ha i wasnt laughing at your comp, what i meant was start laughing now at my comp because it id by far not an optimal system but gets the job done want to start building a quad core system but low on funds. sounds like you have a nice setup as is. my processor is a dual core 2.4 ghz 6600 and have kingston ddr2 memory as well. Soundblaster is XFI extreme gamer

Comment from misticsniper
Time: December 6, 2009, 1:48 pm

This guy doesn’t know anything about computers…he just reads scripts and says it…he probably is some geek that plays pokemon on his gameboy…I see this guy mess up all the time of saying stupid crap…it’s an easy job bring logan back!

Comment from NOXXism
Time: December 15, 2009, 1:55 pm

He makes it look like a 5770

Comment from camargo2012
Time: December 19, 2009, 9:52 pm

i have this card but the XFX version with 768MB.butwindows vista and 7 marks it with 1535MB!! O_o

Comment from camargo2012
Time: December 19, 2009, 9:53 pm

@camargo2012 even GTA 4 marks it with 1535!! O_o

Comment from Drcrazypants23
Time: December 20, 2009, 7:08 pm

@camargo2012 your system probably shares its onboard memory with it

Comment from Drcrazypants23
Time: December 20, 2009, 7:09 pm

@ebayporn123 hahahahahaha

Comment from steven4570
Time: December 21, 2009, 10:01 pm

trust me he knows crap loads about them

Comment from Kopzif
Time: December 23, 2009, 6:26 am

that guy is talking like this is the most awesome and powerfull card of the universe… comeon its just a mid-low range vid card..

Comment from fatgoit
Time: December 29, 2009, 6:57 pm

itsok but even world of war craft has gone heavy on the graphics now that there are so many cheap high spec cards out there my old 7900gtx is strugling with fps now

Comment from guzarche3
Time: January 3, 2010, 9:26 am

huh my 9600gt 1Gb has a HDMI port

Comment from greyfoxzero
Time: January 12, 2010, 7:17 am

Vista and Win 7 can dedicate system memory for video cards. Stay away from these gimped 9600 gso cards, go for the older ones that had ddr3, 96 stream processors, and a 192 bit bus. Grabbed one for 60 bucks at bestbuy on clearance and will stomp the new 9600gso’s.

Comment from xxnecroxx2oo4
Time: January 15, 2010, 1:47 pm

It’s not the best card in the world, but for the price, its a deal

Comment from neonzion7
Time: January 17, 2010, 2:52 pm

@greyfoxzero finally!!!!! sum1 who knows about 9600gsos every1 buys the crappy 768mb version, the 768mb version suck!!!!! the 384mb version is real real good!

Comment from greyfoxzero
Time: January 17, 2010, 11:06 pm

Make sure its got the 192 bit bus with gddr3 and 96 stream processors. They come in different memory configs but if you can land the one the 768 mb on the 192 bit bus you’ll get more longevity out of the card. It certainly isnt the fastest card on the planet but considering the price at that its still better than the more expensive gt240 its still a viable card. Don’t be fooled by the new ones with 128 bit bus or 48 stream processors.

Comment from rayright15
Time: January 20, 2010, 5:37 pm

gt240 is actually better. it’s better than all the gso’s. it’s just a tad (5% – 10% max) less powerful than the 9600 gt. and sometimes it’s more powerful. but yes it’s more expensive.

Comment from greyfoxzero
Time: January 21, 2010, 7:21 am

The original 9600 gso, the one that was a relabeled 8800gs, not the newer versions, will perform like a gt240, when overclocked will surpass it. A good overclock on an original 96 sp, 192 bit bus gddr3 gso will perform close to a 8800gt. Overall on paper they have very similiar specs.

Comment from malcommerriweather
Time: January 28, 2010, 5:03 pm

I have the standard XFX 9600GSO 1GB and it does an awesome job for what I paid for it a year ago. Runs most games on high settings at 1680X1050. I was wondering though if there is much advantage in running them in SLI since I’m considering throwing in another one since the cost has gone down so much. Will I be able to run higher AA and texture settings? Any ideas are welcomed.

Comment from oc5nsli341nforce4
Time: February 9, 2010, 5:21 pm

Yes just be sure that the rest of the system is up to the job such as having the right board that can support sli as well a decent psu. PS clean the one got.

Comment from TheMichiganNinja
Time: February 13, 2010, 4:16 am

I dont know much about computers but what would be the best graphics card for an hp slimline s5123w?

Comment from chillybanana101
Time: February 17, 2010, 9:52 pm

that thing is a fuckin beast

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: February 19, 2010, 3:40 pm

Well your computer is not built for gaming so if you get anything over 80 bucks it will be bottle-necked to shit by your crappy best buy motherboard and shitty 1999 sempron CPU or w/e, so your best off with a used 9600 GSO or 8800 GT from ebay or amazon.

Comment from TheMichiganNinja
Time: February 19, 2010, 8:50 pm

well i got a good one i only play garry’s mod

Comment from midnightjumper348
Time: February 24, 2010, 9:06 am

Yes it is XD Truly I have Three of them =D an they are loud.. But they get the Job Done. About the only problem you will ever have with it is the newest video driver It makes Every thing To big Anyway Have fun An Enjoy it if you buy one Thank’s nick

Comment from midnightjumper348
Time: February 24, 2010, 9:19 am

XD But What I’m Getting At Is If your gonna Get Another 9600GSO Video Card You will see an improvement in video… I’d say 50% better Quality.WARNING If you Have Windows Vista 64/32 bit DO NOT UPGRADE TO THE NEWEST DRIVER It make’s Every over sized an out of range… Anyway gotta run

Comment from midnightjumper348
Time: February 24, 2010, 9:19 am

I have Three They Run Like cheetahs An there loud But When I start a game up They have no problem Running the video weather or not it’s counter strike,COD2,COD4 ,Halo Custom Edition, Doom 3,Or any other game ..

Comment from midnightjumper348
Time: February 24, 2010, 9:20 am

Sorry there is not much space in these boxes

Comment from rayright15
Time: March 21, 2010, 3:26 pm

is it just me or albert at 2:24

Comment from EminemBeastFan24
Time: March 26, 2010, 4:22 pm

my Nvidia 9600 GSO Verto is $110 but i have no 6-pin PCI connector so im using a different graphics card Nvidia Geforce Galaxy 8400 GS 512MB DDR2. graphics card it has-Specifications: 550MHz Core Clock-1375 Shader Clock-1600 MHz Memory Data Rate,effective-768MB GDDR3 Memory- 192-bit Memory Interface- 38.4 GB/sec. Memory Bandwidth-26.4 billion/sec. Texture Fill Rate_Key Features- Nvidia unified architecture microsoft directX 10 shader model 4.0 supportNvidia SLI Ready Technology an more.

Comment from nikladking
Time: April 7, 2010, 4:08 am

how many cuda cores does it have?

Comment from hotspeed1
Time: April 7, 2010, 4:23 pm

i have the same graphics card i bought of Ebay about few months ago. when i put in to the graphics card slot and then oned the computer i couldnt see on DXDIAG that my graphic card is installed i even downloaded the drivers for it but doesnt say NVIDIA 9600 GSO i dnt why SOMEONE please please help me out i would be really thankfull to you. another thing i dont know is whether i you have to plug in the 6 pin pci express connecter to power it up.

Comment from hotspeed1
Time: April 9, 2010, 5:51 am

@nikladking how do i knw that? i mean i dnt even knw what cuda cores is?

Comment from cooltv4
Time: April 9, 2010, 9:03 pm

yea prob gonna get this.

Comment from nikladking
Time: April 12, 2010, 3:01 pm

@hotspeed1 you just go on the invidia website or contact the seller and it has 96 cores

Comment from lopi141
Time: April 19, 2010, 4:34 pm

@neptoon07 and wat res

Comment from neptoon07
Time: April 19, 2010, 4:56 pm

@lopi141 well what res would you recommend for this

Comment from iamjoseph951
Time: May 23, 2010, 9:25 pm

is the XFX Fatality version better than the EVGA one ?

Comment from Georgefromaccounting
Time: July 3, 2010, 11:37 am

just get a 9800 gt……

Comment from Joserpillarramos1
Time: July 5, 2010, 3:44 am

Does it come with 6 pin??

Comment from corvetteguy1980
Time: July 28, 2010, 12:06 am

the ATI Radeon HD 4650 is better, thats what i have in my system.

Comment from basbas63
Time: July 30, 2010, 11:47 am

@corvetteguy1980 theyre about the same…

Comment from 1TheBlindLeader1
Time: August 3, 2010, 10:07 am

@TheBlitz1 …This should run every current game at max graphics.

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 3, 2010, 8:46 pm

@1TheBlindLeader1 The 9600 GSO is actually a re-branded 8800 GS which can barley reach 30 FPS on HL2 at medium settings. Many online magazines and review sites such as guru3d and hardocp consider 30FPS to be the lowest possible playable FPS rate, I myself consider anything under 50 FPS to be a graphical failure. Nvidia’s 7, 8, and 9 series GPUS as well as ATIs HD 3850/3870 are very old, have a failed architecture and notorious for being sub-standard even disregarding the sheer age of the cards

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 3, 2010, 8:51 pm

Even the 4850, 4870, GTS 250, GTX 260 are approaching death and obsolescence with the release of Nvidias new GTX 460 (which fills the mid-range market), and GTX 470/480; the first nvidia cards to feature GDDR5 and DX11 on a 55nm chipset architecture, which is a big step up from the 65 and 95 nanometers of the 8800 GTX and 8800 ULTRA (cards which also fail). The 9600 GSO being below the above mentioned cards in speed, memory bandwidth, ROP’s, etc, I would say no it cannot play most games. =D

Comment from ldragonheart
Time: August 5, 2010, 11:44 pm

@TheBlitz1 to bad ati is raping nvidia right now!!!

Comment from 94XJ
Time: August 21, 2010, 11:58 pm

@TheBlitz1 Not all of them…the first GSOs used a G92 with the 96 SP where as this is a G94 with only 48 SP.

Comment from 94XJ
Time: August 22, 2010, 12:01 am

@ldragonheart Except in that 460 market. ATI doesn’t have an offering at that price point with similar performance (yet).

Comment from vangstaz
Time: August 27, 2010, 5:43 pm

@TheBlitz1 Wow, what a stupid comment. You obviously know nothing about computer hardware. Cannot play most games? WTF? Hell yeah this card will still play today’s games, not at the maximum settings but at a decent setting that will still produce some very amazing frame rates. It’s the 9600GSO dude. I had a RADEON HD 4350 that’s almost 3 times less powerful than this 9600GSO and I’m still able to play any of today’s games with it.

Comment from vangstaz
Time: August 27, 2010, 11:15 pm

@PimpinSimpson21 Keep it up, no wonder you’re not replying xD.It was 4, and now it’s 7. What can it be next? You lose the debate my friend.

Comment from vangstaz
Time: August 28, 2010, 12:01 am

@LeavesonTrees341 As long as the graphics card gets you from A to B then it’s good. Plus most people don’t play games all day.

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 12:50 am

@PINKisGOOOD The only reason your satisfied is because you have no point of view regarding any card other cards, ignorance in this manner displays your bias, thus your opinion is overuled by mine, a person which has used and owns every single high end nvidia card since the 6800 GT. When I used dual 8800 GT’s and benchmarked them against dual 9600 GSO’s in the same system with 3DMark06, the GSO’s were over 6 thousand 3dmarks less, and the price of dual GSO’s is only $25 less than dual 8800 GT’s.

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 12:57 am

@TheBlitz1 its the 9600gso dumbfuck, its not meant to go against the 8800gt and even 2 gso vs 2 8800gt ofcourse the 8800gts will be faster. can you atleast respect the 9600gso for what it is? i love the damn card because it has played all my games and movies i don’t respect you because your a retarded kid who knows shit about graphics cards. really stop talking about your precious 8800gt for once okay baby?

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 1:07 am

@PINKisGOOOD besides me being a dumb fuck and a retarded kid baby, the point is the 9600 GSO was never a feasible option economically or perfromance wise, due to the fact that it is only 20 dollars more for a 8800 GT, while you gain 40% more performance.

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 1:07 am

that might also be why it was killed off so quickly

Comment from vangstaz
Time: August 28, 2010, 1:16 am

@TheBlitz1 Wow and the conversation still sustains…

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 1:16 am

@TheBlitz1 psh the gso died off because of the 9600gt which is a bit faster but as long as my gso still plays all my games and movies then im good

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 2:43 am

@PINKisGOOOD Actually the 9600 GT and the 9600 GSO were manufactured at the same time. And since when does the ability to play movies reflect the performance ability of a product…

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 11:50 am

@TheBlitz1 one question what did my gso do to you that made you so mad? it’s only a graphics card okay i like the card you don’t so get over it because people have different preference. end of story

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 11:54 am

@PINKisGOOOD I’m not mad, I’m just informing you that the 9600 GSO was never a viable option for use with any modern graphics engines.

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 12:06 pm

@TheBlitz1 i disagree to that and so will others what makes you think that the gso is not a viable option with modern graphics engines? its 2010 and this card was built in early 2008 cmon get your facts straight and respect the card for what it is will ya baby? and if you did own every card from the 6800 series then you shouhldnt be talking about how bad each card is but instead talk about there pros.can you explain why i can play crysis in 720p high settings with 4x aa with my gso then?

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 12:47 pm

@PINKisGOOOD Your not giving any specific testable facts, you just say “play” when performanceis measured in Frames Per Second, the simple fact is that the 9600 GSO is a rebranded 8800 GS, it cannot achieve even 30 FPS stable at 1600×1200 with all settings at maximum on HLS/DODS/CSS without AA and AS. That means it can defintley not run CryEngine 2 at even 12FPS on ANY resolution. My GTX 295 Superclocked + Core i7 930 struggle to reach 40FPS at 1920×1200 on high settings minus AA/AS.

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 1:10 pm

@TheBlitz1 dude, it’s a fucking mid-range graphics card. see you’re comparing my gso to your 295 now thats fucking stupid. its the 9600gso alright? its not meant to go against the newer cards fucktard you dont seem to understand. this is a midrange graphics card this is a midrange graphics card this is a midrange graphics card!!!crysis at my settings runs at an average of 30fps if you consider that not playable then your an idiot because 30fps is truly playable. why are you so ignorant?

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 6:35 pm

@PINKisGOOOD In order for a 9600 GSO to be a good card, it has to be competitive economically and performance wise with other cards in the same price range, its not. The 9600 GSO was priced between 65 to 75 dollars. You can buy a single 9800 GT or 8800 GT for 80 to 90 dollars, those cards outperform the 9600 GSO by 15 to 20 FPS average on HL2DM/CSS/DODS. This shows how the 9600 GSO (8800 GS) has a crippled architecture.

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 6:36 pm

@PINKisGOOOD In order for a 9600 GSO to be a good card, it has to be competitive economically and performance wise with other cards in the same price range, its not. The 9600 GSO was priced between 65 to 75 dollars. You could buy a single 9800 GT or 8800 GT then, for 80 to 90 dollars, those cards outperform the 9600 GSO by 15 to 20 FPS average on HL2DM/CSS/DODS.

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 6:36 pm

[..YouTube..] @PINKisGOOOD In order for a 9600 GSO to be a good card, it has to be competitive economically and performance wise with other cards in the same price range, its not. The 9600 GSO was priced between 65 to 75 dollars. You could buy a single 9800 GT or 8800 GT then, for 80 to 90 dollars, those cards outperform the 9600 GSO by 15 to 20 FPS average on HL2DM/CSS/DODS.

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 7:04 pm

@TheBlitz1 wow are you some kind of graphics card christian freak to come to peoples videos and convert them to buy what you think is good? im done waistin my time with you since you dont understand what makes a good graphics card.its like saying my 4 door sadan vs your 18 wheeler who can hold more? the 18 wheeler dumbshit the 4 door sadan is not meant to carry all that load. thats it im done waisting time. go troll elsewhere troll ima go grab a pizza and play crysis on my shitty gso ok troll?

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 7:04 pm

[..YouTube..] @TheBlitz1 wow are you some kind of graphics card christian freak to come to peoples videos and convert them to buy what you think is good? im done waistin my time with you since you dont understand what makes a good graphics card.its like saying my 4 door sadan vs your 18 wheeler who can hold more? the 18 wheeler dumbshit the 4 door sadan is not meant to carry all that load. thats it im done waisting time. go troll elsewhere troll ima go grab a pizza and play crysis on my shitty gso ok troll?

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 10:15 pm

@PINKisGOOOD The 9600 GSO is a re-branded 8800 GS which can barley reach 30 FPS on HL2 at medium settings. Many online magazines and review sites such as guru3d and hardocp consider 30FPS to be the lowest possible playable FPS rate, I myself consider anything under 50 FPS to be a graphical failure. Nvidia’s 7, 8, and 9 series GPUS as well as ATIs HD 3850/3870 are very old, have a failed architecture and notorious for being sub-standard even disregarding the sheer age of the cards

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: August 28, 2010, 10:15 pm

[..YouTube..] @PINKisGOOOD The 9600 GSO is a re-branded 8800 GS which can barley reach 30 FPS on HL2 at medium settings. Many online magazines and review sites such as guru3d and hardocp consider 30FPS to be the lowest possible playable FPS rate, I myself consider anything under 50 FPS to be a graphical failure. Nvidia’s 7, 8, and 9 series GPUS as well as ATIs HD 3850/3870 are very old, have a failed architecture and notorious for being sub-standard even disregarding the sheer age of the cards

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 10:34 pm

@TheBlitz1 okay. i get your point. no graphics card is good. you see, from your OPINION no graphics card can get a solid 50 fps at 1080p, 16x aa with maximum settings in crysis. you happy now you dumbfuck?its only YOUR opinion that 50 fps is unplayable. your lying that magazins and guru3d are saying that 30fps is unplayableconsoles play at most only 30 fps if not less so your also saying that consoles are shit because of that? and again from your opinion, EVERY SINGLE FUCKING CARD SUCKS.

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 10:34 pm

[..YouTube..] @TheBlitz1 okay. i get your point. no graphics card is good. you see, from your OPINION no graphics card can get a solid 50 fps at 1080p, 16x aa with maximum settings in crysis. you happy now you dumbfuck?its only YOUR opinion that 50 fps is unplayable. your lying that magazins and guru3d are saying that 30fps is unplayableconsoles play at most only 30 fps if not less so your also saying that consoles are shit because of that? and again from your opinion, EVERY SINGLE FUCKING CARD SUCKS.

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 10:37 pm

@TheBlitz1 as you can see, not every single fucking graphics card in this world is built for gaming obviously you have never played with anything lower than your precious 295 because you have no fucking knowledge to how the mid end and lower end graphics card peroform. my 9600gso at 720p, high settings with 4xaa WITH 30fps IS FUCKING IMPRESSIVE FOR A FUCKING MIDRANGE GRAPHICS CARD. the hd 3870 are old cards but they were fucking fantastic back in those days alright? learn the dates too kid

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 10:37 pm

[..YouTube..] @TheBlitz1 as you can see, not every single fucking graphics card in this world is built for gaming obviously you have never played with anything lower than your precious 295 because you have no fucking knowledge to how the mid end and lower end graphics card peroform. my 9600gso at 720p, high settings with 4xaa WITH 30fps IS FUCKING IMPRESSIVE FOR A FUCKING MIDRANGE GRAPHICS CARD. the hd 3870 are old cards but they were fucking fantastic back in those days alright? learn the dates too kid

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 10:40 pm

@TheBlitz1 and once again there are lower end cards, mid range card high end cards, older cards, and newer cards. each and every one of them DO NOT carry the same features as others. stop trolling and get this. you consider 50fps not playable and its a failure. I CONSIDER THAT 30FPS IS PLAYABLE its only your preferences, stop telling other people to believe what you think because we are all so damn tired of you ignorant people. i asked you a question earlier butthead, why are you so ignorant?

Comment from PINKisGOOOD
Time: August 28, 2010, 10:40 pm

[..YouTube..] @TheBlitz1 and once again there are lower end cards, mid range card high end cards, older cards, and newer cards. each and every one of them DO NOT carry the same features as others. stop trolling and get this. you consider 50fps not playable and its a failure. I CONSIDER THAT 30FPS IS PLAYABLE its only your preferences, stop telling other people to believe what you think because we are all so damn tired of you ignorant people. i asked you a question earlier butthead, why are you so ignorant?