HP LP2480zx 24″ Widescreen LCD Monitor

Comment from Uploadvidz
Time: February 25, 2009, 8:15 pm

such a waste of money, could get 2, 40inch lcd’s with that

Comment from clays121
Time: February 26, 2009, 1:03 am

I agree this is a waste of money for most people, and you could build a nice AMD PC, and get a good Monitor for it, and still have a good chunk of money left over, for things like everyday life stuff.

Comment from illage2
Time: February 26, 2009, 1:11 am

Why would;t you need one, well if you have a colour monitor then you don’t need one

Comment from illage2
Time: February 26, 2009, 1:11 am

Agreed

Comment from skylineaddict
Time: February 26, 2009, 6:24 am

What people don’t get is that this monitor is mostly for professionals working in Photoshop. If you listen carefully, he says, “Color critical situations.” Most monitors in class cost about the same and sometimes more.

Comment from PacMang69
Time: February 27, 2009, 11:12 am

fuck hp

Comment from moutaz
Time: February 27, 2009, 9:32 pm

my sister thinks alberts cuteso do i ; )

Comment from TheArea510
Time: March 1, 2009, 12:00 am

DELL on mind!

Comment from essentialeugene
Time: March 1, 2009, 3:27 pm

When I bought my PC from Costco, the guy showed me the HP 24” screen. He showed me that I can turn it around but I prefer the ViewSonic or Gateway one. Some screens are for people that like games, graphics, photos, etc.

Comment from xDEADLOCKEDx2468
Time: March 1, 2009, 10:16 pm

I got a better one then that monitor: Samsung 24″ HDTV, 1080p full HD.

Comment from SukhoiSu37Terminator
Time: March 3, 2009, 12:24 pm

Dell is way better at making monitors.

Comment from ccricers
Time: March 3, 2009, 7:52 pm

The reason of its price and quality is that it’s an S-IPS panel. Your everyday LCD panel is a TN panel, good for general purpose and gaming but colors are more washed out, especially if you look at it from side angles. So yeah, you won’t be buying this to play L4D.

Comment from zergdog
Time: March 3, 2009, 9:15 pm

LMAo dell dont make LCD they just have there name stamped on the product… someone else just makes it for them.

Comment from AmericansSexualPreds
Time: March 4, 2009, 11:39 pm

TIGER DIRECT SUCKSSSSSHAHAHAHAH FAGGOTS THE presentor is a gay lord of the fuycher

Comment from AmericansSexualPreds
Time: March 4, 2009, 11:39 pm

TIGER DIRECT SUCKSSSSSHAHAHAHAH FAGGOTS THE presentor is a gay lord of the fuycher

Comment from DoraStalker
Time: March 5, 2009, 8:08 pm

says the pedofile with no life

Comment from yomith
Time: March 8, 2009, 9:51 pm

The colors didn’t look like anything special..Maybe it’s just YouTube..

Comment from yomith
Time: March 8, 2009, 9:51 pm

The colors didn’t look like anything special..

Maybe it’s just YouTube..

Comment from wax333
Time: March 10, 2009, 11:37 pm

lol not just YouTube itd be your own screen

Comment from tweaker9999
Time: March 11, 2009, 6:24 am

i think ill get this one

Comment from yomith
Time: March 11, 2009, 5:01 pm

I suppose so.But they still don’t seem like something to invest all that money into -.O

Comment from yomith
Time: March 11, 2009, 5:01 pm

I suppose so.
But they still don’t seem like something to invest all that money into -.O

Comment from agungk
Time: March 12, 2009, 10:11 am

i read somewhere that a true “millions colors” LCD would be slower (above 8ms) response time.so if someone selling you a 16million-colors monitor with 2ms response time, it’s probably bogus.

Comment from agungk
Time: March 12, 2009, 10:11 am

i read somewhere that a true “millions colors” LCD would be slower (above 8ms) response time.
so if someone selling you a 16million-colors monitor with 2ms response time, it’s probably bogus.

Comment from yomith
Time: March 15, 2009, 4:58 pm

Yeah I mean, if you have the money for it, I’d definitely get it. Based on the ratings and reviews it seems like a good product, but also very expensive… Whats the price for it?

Comment from tuberoako777
Time: March 15, 2009, 12:06 pm

well im not investing in this since it wont be practical for me.. but for those PROs that will be able 2 completely utilize this and have the budget for it.. its good i guess.. not only do u get superior colors (really hard 2 see in you tube, try typing TN vs IPS here, search for the vid).. but u get superior viewing angles as well

Comment from Samdamana
Time: March 15, 2009, 2:06 pm

he says “color space” like some kinda mexican

Comment from yomith
Time: March 15, 2009, 4:58 pm

Yeah
I mean, if you have the money for it, I’d definitely get it. Based on the ratings and reviews it seems like a good product, but also very expensive… Whats the price for it?

Comment from TheBlitz1
Time: March 19, 2009, 6:04 pm

most response times are measured from G2G so its irrelevant either way no matter what they post.

Comment from kickdoeent
Time: March 22, 2009, 7:08 pm

he does lol

Comment from enyownz
Time: March 30, 2009, 2:23 pm

should i get it for gaming?

Comment from slomarik
Time: April 3, 2009, 8:07 am

I cann only say: Samsung syncmaster 1200NF CRT :> Cheaper and probably bether

Comment from farshidw3
Time: April 4, 2009, 5:22 pm

“A billion… with a B!”

Comment from merdian
Time: April 6, 2009, 2:38 pm

i have HP and hp is the best monitor for clear screen and colour

Comment from styXv3ngeance
Time: April 18, 2009, 9:24 am

no its a billion with a z ==”

Comment from Ketou
Time: May 2, 2009, 10:49 pm

I was just thinking that while I was watching : )

Comment from 26psyside
Time: May 18, 2009, 1:15 pm

Most users dont understand that the most imporant part of the pc is THE MONITORyou look at it all the time the power of VGA means almost nothing w/o good monitoryou wont get any of the extras of high endgraphic cards/pc ask me with T240 suchwaste of money bad colors loss of detailsinput lag, ghosting, bad viewing angles !!!!HORROR!

Comment from 26psyside
Time: May 18, 2009, 1:17 pm

Also there is alot cheaper and (better monitor then this one) NEC2490 is the best monitorin the world in price range of 2000/2500 dollarsand it cost only 1000$ amaizing piece of technology!!

Comment from krayzgerman
Time: May 19, 2009, 9:45 am

no, billion with double D’s. (. )( .)

Comment from entyceit
Time: May 24, 2009, 11:05 pm

whats with the edges?? it got cut off and theres 2 black strips on its left and right side.

Comment from durrthock
Time: May 24, 2009, 11:43 pm

Its scaling the images.

Comment from Rikimaru915
Time: June 14, 2009, 8:27 pm

not just the monitor is amazing, but the price is amazing too^_^ $1999.98

Comment from UFOsportsJeroen
Time: June 16, 2009, 4:20 pm

i adore it

Comment from shadowblade90222
Time: July 7, 2009, 2:57 pm

Uhh no! The PC Wouldn’t even run without the PSU…

Comment from qhoa1385
Time: July 13, 2009, 4:37 pm

does any1 have any recommendation for me?i need a monitor between 22″ – 24″ (widescreen of course)but the important thing (which makes it hard to find) is that the screen should be matte x(i have 4 windows in my roomnormal screen is ok too

Comment from MultiFunseeker
Time: July 24, 2009, 2:03 am

does it have aspect ratio control? =/

Comment from tranquiliz3r23
Time: July 28, 2009, 8:31 am

I think you should Check out the Samsung Syncmaster 2493hm… its 24″ really nice specs and and most important for you is matte. Its not a lot of money either

Comment from kotapaka
Time: July 30, 2009, 8:14 pm

I have the feeling that this guy is not subjective. The way he says it every monitor is the best on his own Besides if you want colour use CRT. It’s that simple. No professional who needs colour is going to use LCD.

Comment from TheGreatStash1994
Time: October 2, 2009, 12:07 am

CRT? Really???Dude stop living in the past……

Comment from Daviddagr8
Time: October 5, 2009, 2:15 pm

Actually CRT monitors are still being made and it has been proven that a 22″ 1600×1200 CRT has buch better colour than a 1600×1200 LCD

Comment from TheGreatStash1994
Time: October 5, 2009, 5:49 pm

but my 25.5″ monitor doesn’t weigh 70 pounds…

Comment from Daviddagr8
Time: October 6, 2009, 3:38 am

yes, there is that but i suppse you won’t move it much anyway

Comment from TheGreatStash1994
Time: October 6, 2009, 11:46 pm

They still do take up a lot of room though and they hurt my eyes during prolonged use. They are still good, but are quickly becoming obsolete…

Comment from BigBoss7777777
Time: October 30, 2009, 1:08 pm

My monitor is better.

Comment from sitadriver
Time: November 14, 2009, 2:58 am

HP w2408h is better.

Comment from m1ndz00
Time: November 19, 2009, 6:46 am

LCD is far more affordable and ergonomic, not to mention that no one uses CRT monitors at home any more so the end result will be more consistent with LCD.Most importantly, new technology integrated into LCDs – like this one – is outstripping CRTs of any qualitative advantages.

Comment from Ibringthetruth1
Time: December 31, 2009, 11:38 pm

RGB leds! = huge color gamut.best thing next to Oled.

Comment from Ibringthetruth1
Time: December 31, 2009, 11:38 pm

[..YouTube..] RGB leds! = huge color gamut.best thing next to Oled.

Comment from 633336
Time: January 4, 2010, 12:24 pm

its actually 10 bit color each of the 3 primaries get 10 bit

Comment from 633336
Time: January 4, 2010, 12:24 pm

[..YouTube..] its actually 10 bit color each of the 3 primaries get 10 bit

Comment from clintdiamante99
Time: January 28, 2010, 10:46 am

@Daviddagr8 that’s true. CRT has better response time, better color but you face the consequences.. 1st of all it’s big, 2nd it’s power hungry, 3rd not really stylish, 4th it’s old, 5th it’s dangerous, anything it can explode infront of ur face.

Comment from clintdiamante99
Time: January 28, 2010, 10:46 am

[..YouTube..] @Daviddagr8 that’s true. CRT has better response time, better color but you face the consequences.. 1st of all it’s big, 2nd it’s power hungry, 3rd not really stylish, 4th it’s old, 5th it’s dangerous, anything it can explode infront of ur face.

Comment from telemetry9
Time: January 29, 2010, 3:24 pm

have a look at the syncmaster 2433.

Comment from telemetry9
Time: January 29, 2010, 3:24 pm

[..YouTube..] have a look at the syncmaster 2433.

Comment from telemetry9
Time: January 29, 2010, 3:24 pm

[..YouTube..] have a look at the syncmaster 2433.

Comment from telemetry9
Time: January 29, 2010, 3:24 pm

[..YouTube..] have a look at the syncmaster 2433.

Comment from telemetry9
Time: January 29, 2010, 3:24 pm

[..YouTube..] have a look at the syncmaster 2433.

Comment from telemetry9
Time: January 29, 2010, 3:24 pm

[..YouTube..] have a look at the syncmaster 2433.

Comment from telemetry9
Time: January 29, 2010, 3:24 pm

[..YouTube..] have a look at the syncmaster 2433.

Comment from telemetry9
Time: January 29, 2010, 3:24 pm

[..YouTube..] have a look at the syncmaster 2433.

Comment from telemetry9
Time: January 29, 2010, 3:24 pm

[..YouTube..] have a look at the syncmaster 2433.

Comment from MrNuun
Time: February 14, 2010, 3:07 pm

100% non-affortable unless you’re Bill Gates. I mean $2500?! That much for a display.. There are defenetly similiar displays on the market for a quater of that price.

Comment from MrNuun
Time: February 14, 2010, 3:07 pm

[..YouTube..] 100% non-affortable unless you’re Bill Gates. I mean $2500?! That much for a display.. There are defenetly similiar displays on the market for a quater of that price.