Graphic Card Auctions

Comment from vaibhav402
Time: September 15, 2011, 3:26 am

@ Vaibhav402 quick response plz I really need a good gfx card .. I run Crysis on a 9500GT Freakin (

Comment from vaibhav402
Time: September 15, 2011, 4:21 am

ati 6850 OT 6870? I know that 6870 is better, but I have a price constraint … u can tell which is the cheapest … plz plz some1 can also plz suggest a good range card for about $ 200 to 220 mi

Comment from MrTheEgoMan
Time: September 15, 2011, 5:07 am

@ FalloutMan493 its all good.

Comment from FalloutMan493
Time: September 15, 2011, 5:39 am

@ MrTheEgoMan this is true, I understand using the hexagonal cores for video editing and such because they take a little CPU, so in a utilitarian perspective it is certainly going to be more useful than a quad without a doubt. I was targeting the “gamer” crowd do not seem to quite understand how this thing works, but you have the right idea. sorry if it sounded like I was going down on you.

Comment from MrTheEgoMan
Time: September 15, 2011, 6:23 am

Fashion @ Benchmark thealmin94.

Comment from MrTheEgoMan
Time: September 15, 2011, 6:42 am

@ FalloutMan493 What you say is tottaly right. more cars will move more peeps. More cores will run more applications. All about multi-tasking and I apologize if I was misunderstood. I love my 1055T as it has good power for gaming but also for multi tasking is something I do while gaming. Having two screens alows me to use several programs simultaneously, and allows the processor 6-core course.

Comment from FalloutMan493
Time: September 15, 2011, 7:27 am

ALL OK I’ll put this quad core vs core hexagonal bs to rest. more cores does NOT mean better performance. a hexagon of 3.6 and 3.6 of a quad the same company will be identical in speed and here’s why. Say you have four cars running at 3.6 miles per hour. add two other cars passing 3.6 miles per hour are not other cars faster. If you have a large ego and feel like you want to have three running Crysis at the same time, then a hexagon will suit you best. MHz does add up. Quad 3.4> hex3.3

Comment from thealmin94
Time: September 15, 2011, 8:09 am

tessellation extreme?

Comment from misthafly
Time: September 15, 2011, 8:24 am

@ MrTheEgoMan I agree with you on this point, but the AMD Phenom X4 Black Edition 965 is much better in game then the 1055T as shown in the benchmarks. The 1055T is for rendering or multi-tasking. Basically, if you are a player to get the right edition 965 Black and you are more of a record or multi-Tasker then get 1055T.

Comment from MrTheEgoMan
Time: September 15, 2011, 8:51 am

@ BlaineDeschain The next time your comment, the sentence about who you are talking about. Do you even know why I bought a processor 6core? Do you even know if I am or not multi-tasking right now? It is not because its a clip of the video game that what I said applies only to video games as you seem to think.

Comment from BlaineDeschain
Time: September 15, 2011, 9:12 am

@ MrTheEgoMan No, it would not. Because more cores does not mean more gaming performance, it’s great for multi-task with multiple threads programs, but games rarely, if ever, use more than 2 threads. If you buy these high-end components at least the trouble to learn how computers work.

Comment from MrTheEgoMan
Time: September 15, 2011, 10:08 am

@ Georgescu7998 multitasking

Comment from georgescu7998
Time: September 15, 2011, 10:15 am

loll how it was better than Phenom II 965? 2.8 MHz vs. 3.4 MHzPendant a moment I think do not exist any game or software to operate in six hearts! Peace D!

Comment from KennyMosquera
Time: September 15, 2011, 11:12 am

my system is similar to yours, but my 3.0 GHz AMD X4 945 is that it will not let me emulate DX11, if I can, but slightly delayed …

Comment from MrTheEgoMan
Time: September 15, 2011, 11:32 am

@ TheNewbpowner123Ouais, compare apples to apples. (Overclocked to overclocked). Stop 1055T is all about core 2.8GHz, its better then a non-OC 965. If you overclock both, the 1055T is even better.

Comment from TheNewbpowner123
Time: September 15, 2011, 11:33 am

@ 2.8GHz MrTheEgoMan you said about all the nuclei

Comment from MrTheEgoMan
Time: September 15, 2011, 12:20 pm

@ TheNewbpowner123Qu’en 1055T is it overclocked to? duh

Comment from TheNewbpowner123
Time: September 15, 2011, 12:37 pm

A 965 overclocked would be better: s

Comment from MrTheEgoMan
Time: September 15, 2011, 12:48 pm

@ KennyMosquera socket AM3,